Netanyahu's crimes against humanity are crimes against Judaism
Meanwhile, we do indeed see an alarming rise of antisemitism worldwide, for a very simple reason that’s perfectly easy to understand. It is that far too many people, on all sides, just don’t bother to draw any clear distinctions between Jews or Judaism, the state of Israel, and the current government of that state. In the case of Netanyahu and his allies or supporters, this is perfectly convenient because it allows them to accuse anyone of "antisemitism" who dares to critize their policies and actions. But it’s just as convenient for their opponents, because it allows them to use this government’s inhumanity as a weapon for attacking the state of Israel’s right to exist or, indeed, for “blaming the Jews.” And then, of course, there is everybody else. Normal, decent people all over the world find it unbearable to watch the daily atrocities but do not necessarily think all too deeply about who is to blame and who isn't, about the complex historical developments that brought us where we are, or indeed about distinguishing a bit more carefully between the Netanyahu government, the state of Israel as such, and Jews in general.
Such intellectual carelessness may be human nature, but it’s not an excuse. We are witnessing acts of inhumanity, the memory of which will be haunting all of us for generations to come, and none of us will be able to claim that “we did not know.” We did know, or at the very least we could have known if we had bothered to open our eyes and pay attention, but too many of us don’t want to know and prefer to look away. On the other hand, and understandably enough, too many of those who cannot bring themselves to look away are deeply confused by the complexity of the issues. As a result, they may not always be aware of how easily their own heartfelt feelings of sorrow and outrage may be mined and manipulated by the cynical forces of polarization, extremism and hate. As for myself, I’m not a Jew and I don't live in Israel, but I care deeply about Judaism and everything it stands for. This is precisely why it disturbs me so deeply, not just to watch the routinization of inhumanity that’s on full display in Gaza, but also to see how the atrocious actions and mentality of the current Israeli government are actively feeding the flames of antisemitism. This madness must stop.



Thanks, Wouter, for this important statement.
ReplyDeleteAlong with nearly all Israeli academics I know, I have been protesting against this government since it set out to undermine our democratic institutions -- a reckless, criminal assault that weakened our society even before this horrific war began. A year ago, already in dismay at the shifting discourse in Israel away from what I believe to be basic Jewish values, I prepared a lecture for the Salzburger Hochschulwochen, which was published here: https://www.feinschwarz.net/der-verschwundene-erzfeind-amalek/. Perhaps some of your readers will find it helpful to see a brief review of classical Jewish teachings on the conduct of war (and on political violence more generally).
Thanks Yossi. "Basic Jewish values": yes indeed. It would be pretentious for a goy like me to tell Jews what their basic values are, but I'm more than happy to agree with you!
ReplyDeleteMr Netanyahu probably has his reasons for doing things. Everyone does, including yourself.
ReplyDeleteYour point?
ReplyDeleteDear Anonymous 1, My response was to the general article, not your point, and I clarify that now. The atrocious genocide of the Jews by Hitler and his cohort led eventually to a need for the former to have an independent homeland. Both Netanyahu and Hertzog's fathers were highly educated people who supported the idea of such a space. War and strife on a mass scale are very unfortunate, but Mr Netanyahu is protecting the needs of his homeland. Dr Hanegraaf protects his own field.
ReplyDeleteApologies: Anonymous1 = Wouter Hanegraaff, so the question came from me (there's a problem with this system). I'm not sure what kind of "field" you think I protect. Of course I understand that Netanyahu wants to protect his homeland. My point is that the way he (and his allies) are currently doing this is inhuman and fuels the flames of antisemitism.
DeleteDear Dr Hanegraaff, Thank you for your clarification and response. I do not think it is a state secret that your field is esoteric studies, which is a small but burgeoning sub field of religious studies. You are a respected academic leader of that field. More importantly, it is good for those who read your blog to understand that you fully appreciate Mr Netanyahu's need to protect his homeland. As you have noted above. Not only does the Israeli PM come from an educated background, he is a seasoned and shrewd politician as is the current Israeli president. Since you are not a political leader yourself (being a scholar who handles an academic field not an entire country) perhaps you are not fully aware of how challenging Mr Netanyahu's position is insofar as the global and geopolitical landscape is concerned. But you have a right to air your views on a blog. As for terms like criminal and inhuman I personally do not consider those to be appropriate labels for the Israeli PM, since I am sure you are aware that it would be treasonous for Mr Netanyahu to not protect his homeland to the best of his ability.
ReplyDeleteIndeed, treasonous is an appropriate word to describe a PM who has not condemned Qatari funding of his closest advisors and who has repeatedly chosen to prioritize his own personal interests and the survival of his anti-rule-of-law coalition above state security interests.
DeleteSince this is a blog, you and Dr Hanegraaff are welcome to hold whatever opinions you please. Others may view things entirely differently from the way you both do.
ReplyDeleteAnd since he has permitted an attack on Qatar chajes, I expect the situation is more complex than you or WJH gauged.
ReplyDeletePrecisely as complex as whatever is politically and personally expedient at any given moment for Bibi, "anonymous."
DeleteThat is correct. He's the PM.
ReplyDeleteInteresting how “Palestine” and “Palestinians” weren’t even mentioned…
ReplyDeleteI find that a very strange comment. That Netanyahu's crimes against humanity are committed against the Palestinians is the most obvious of all things...
DeleteOne should be generous. Humans make mistakes. End of story.
ReplyDeleteMight I dare to add a note to the above ? As a student of international political conflict prevention, I am deeply saddened by what Netanyahu, his administration and colleagues are doing. All the suffering, and indeed the counterproductive violence that only worsens antisemitic tensions around the world, could have been prevented. More violence and destruction can be prevented today and tomorrow. Then why is this not happening now ?
ReplyDeleteI would venture my guess : the cycle of violence has become so overwhelming that it benefits those who currently have the loudest voices in political discourse; they seek to benefit from a territorial expansionary ambition for their state, and hope to create a new power-balance in the region in their own favour going by the principle of "might is right". Unfortunately, this is as short-sighted as the ambitions by past leaders, Presidents, Fuehrers, Generalissimos, Great Chairmen and other dictators who thought that they can modify their political-social-military environment by force. This has never worked, and anyone with a deep knowledge of history will prefer to see the parties to conflicts sit a negotiation tables to find common ground instead. The greater and more fierce the fighting and violence today, the more consequential and counterproductive will the after-effects be in the future.
National security and safety for citizens is not going to last long through the use of violent force. Why ? Because even terrorists are someone else's freedom fighters, and they also have their territorial and nationalistic reasons for their political passions; they therefore deserve to sit at a negotiation table with representative of states against whom they have grievances. All parties in a conflict must recognise that every other opposing party's grievances are also legitimate.
When will all this current violence end ? Probably only when the most powerful parties, those who currently believe they are invincible, realise that they and their communities can only prosper until they agree to a peaceful settlement with the opposition parties. Changing "facts on the ground" today will backfire unless clear and visible steps towards a genuine peaceful settlement of the conflict are engaged in - to be initiated by those who hold the greatest power and influence at the moment.